Speaker summary
52% 13 analyzed articles/videos 359.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States Central Command results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 124.015 hits . Analysis detected 925.181 faulty-reasoning hits from 359.333 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,470 of 28,364 speakers). This United States Central Command is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. United States Central Command
Speaker details
Total words: 359.333
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.2% percentile 9.5% BS Score13 analyzed videos359.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 26.6% 26.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 20.4% 20.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.0% 17.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 9.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst