The Secret to Lindsey Graham’s Success. The Professor Who Has Had It with All the AI Cheating. Plus. . . 13%

By The Free Press21%

7/13/2026, 10:03:40 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 743 faulty-reasoning hits from 990 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30% and a BS Rank of 13% (17,920 of 20,515 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the article peer group.

It’s Monday, July 13. 
This is The Front Page , your daily window into the world of The Free Press —and our take on the world at large. 
Today: Can AI really think? 
What do Maine Democrats do now? 
Why does Wikipedia think Lionel Messi is a Mossad agent? 
And much more. 
But first: The death of Lindsey Graham. 
In the 24 hours since Lindsey Graham’s sudden death was announced, the punditocracy has raced to define South Carolina’s senior senator. 
Even as he was being praised by President Donald Trump, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky, his critics focused on his willingness to ally himself with a man he had once described as “a wrecking ball for the future of the Republican Party.” 
In The New Yorker , Ruth Marcus said that in befriending Trump, Graham had abandoned most of his principles. 
On X , Steve Schmidt, a “Never Trumper” and former adviser to the late senator John McCain, called him “a simple, tragic man” who “lacked a moral core.” 
Our Eli Lake has a less jaundiced and, we dare say, more dispassionate view. 
By making his peace with Trump’s victory—and becoming the president’s friend and adviser—Graham was able to “catch more flies with honey than vinegar.” 
Graham’s advice, writes Eli, “helped guide Trump to take military action against Iran, reconsider a premature and sudden withdrawal of U.S. forces from Syria, and perhaps avoid a full breakup with NATO.” 
Unlike so many other politicians who couldn’t countenance working with Trump, Graham got results. 
“The republic lost a giant,” Eli writes. 
Read his appreciation to understand the full breadth of Graham’s influence. 
—The Editors 
Sentient Robots and Cheating Students: Two Dispatches from the AI Revolution 
Last week, Anthropic published a paper arguing that its Claude AI models have “developed a small collection of internal neural patterns,” and that the AI has private thoughts. 
It is the latest example of Silicon Valley claiming AI might be more than just a tool used by humans—and that it could have a consciousness all its own. 
Not so fast, says Spencer Klavan , who pushes back on the creeping movement to equate AI with humans, as if large language models that use mountains of data are reasoning the way humans do. 
Read Spencer’s column to understand why AI really is a machine—nothing less, but nothing more. 
On the other hand, if there is one thing AI has become very good at, it’s helping students cheat on their exams. 
Brown University professor Roberto Serrano estimates that half his students are using AI to cheat. 
That would be bad enough. 
But then Serrano alerted the school—and was shocked to discover that administrators didn’t seem much interested in punishing the cheaters. 
“What happened in my class should be a lesson to all,” Serrano writes: “In our new AI era, if you do not expose and punish cheating, you will encourage it. 
We must all have the strength to choose otherwise.” 
Have you ever read a Free Press article and had questions about it? 
Do you ever wonder what other readers think? 
If the answer is yes to either, you need to check out The Free Press Forum, where FP authors and subscribers can discuss and debate the biggest stories of the day. 
Join now! 
Engage 
The Free Press Forum 
Explore 
This is where Free Pressers stop reading by themselves and start a real conversation with each other. 
Expect good-faith debate, useful recommendations, and maybe even romance. 
MORE FROM THE FREE PRESS 
THE NEWS 
Jannik Sinner celebrates his Wimbledon men’s singles title after defeating Alexander Zverev in the final on Sunday. 
(Kirill Kudryavtsev/AFP via Getty Images 
The United States conducted new strikes on Iranian targets throughout the weekend, according to United States Central Command. 
The strikes culminated in a Sunday barrage aimed at degrading Iranian ability to attack ships in the Strait of Hormuz. 
A preliminary medical examination determined that Senator Lindsey Graham’s cause of death was aortic dissection, a tear along the inner layer of the main artery, due to arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 
Emergency radio dispatch reported a “cardiac arrest” event from Graham’s Capitol Hill home. 
Jannik Sinner won his second straight Wimbledon championship on Sunday, defeating Alexander Zverev. 
It was also his fifth Grand Slam title overall. 
In the women’s final, Linda Noskova beat her fellow Czech Karolina Muchova. 
It was her first Grand Slam title. 
Toronto Police are still searching for a gunman who killed two people and injured four after opening fire Saturday at the city’s Salsa on St. 
Clair festival. 
At least 13,000 people attended the festivals. 
Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, the former Emir of Qatar, died on Saturday , Qatar’s top governing body announced Sunday morning. 
Al-Thani assumed power in 1995, handing over the reins to his son, Tamim ‌bin Hamad Al-Thani, 18 years later. 
He was 74. 
Former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell broke his monthlong silence to announce that his absence from the Senate was due to a fall the 84-year-old took—and that he suffered a case of pneumonia while in the hospital. 
The senator said he is not yet able to return to the Senate floor, but remains engaged with his staff from a rehabilitation center. 
The Trump administration issued subpoenas to several New York Times journalists after they reported that Trump was unable to use his new Qatari-donated Air Force One due to security concerns. 
The paper’s top lawyer called it a brazen attempt to “intimidate journalists from doing their jobs.” 
The long-awaited return of UFC’s Conor McGregor to the octagon ended just a minute into the fight after the UFC superstar reinjured his leg in the opening seconds. 
“This came out of nowhere. 
I am beyond dark here. 
I can only describe it as hell,” McGregor wrote in a post after the fight. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.6%The Free Press: 2.0%The FP: 6.1%Confirmation Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.3%The FP: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%The Free Press: 1.9%The FP: 4.1%Availability Heuristic1.5%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.6%The FP: 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 1.0%The FP: 1.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.8%The FP: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%The Free Press: 5.9%The FP: 10.1%Framing Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.0%The FP: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.2%The FP: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%The Free Press: 0.8%The FP: 1.1%Optimism Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.7%The FP: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%The Free Press: 6.2%The FP: 10.9%Negativity Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.6%The FP: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%The Free Press: 0.3%The FP: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error2.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.2%The FP: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%The Free Press: 0.7%The FP: 1.7%In-Group Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.1%The FP: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%The Free Press: 2.1%The FP: 2.0%Halo Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.0%The FP: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%The Free Press: 1.9%The FP: 2.1%Recency Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.4%The FP: 1.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%The Free Press: 1.0%The FP: 2.0%Ad Hominem4.7%This article: 3.5%The Free Press: 0.2%The FP: 0.8%Straw Man3.5%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 1.8%The FP: 3.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.7%The Free Press: 1.0%The FP: 2.5%False Dilemma4.7%This article: 3.0%The Free Press: 0.2%The FP: 0.8%Slippery Slope3.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.1%The FP: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.4%The Free Press: 3.4%The FP: 8.8%Hasty Generalization6.4%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.0%The FP: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.5%The FP: 1.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.1%The Free Press: 3.0%The FP: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion2.1%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.7%The FP: 1.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 1.0%The FP: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.1%The FP: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.1%The FP: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.1%The FP: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.5%The Free Press: 1.4%The FP: 3.2%Anecdotal1.5%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.0%The FP: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.3%The FP: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.0%The FP: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.0%The FP: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.1%The FP: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.1%The FP: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 1.9%The FP: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.8%The Free Press: 0.9%The FP: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.8%This article: 1.4%The Free Press: 8.0%The FP: 15.4%Biased Writer Voice1.4%This article: 3.5%The Free Press: 1.6%The FP: 2.8%Indoctrination3.5%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 0.1%The FP: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Free Press: 1.0%The FP: 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%The Free Press: 4.6%The FP: 4.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.0%

990 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers30%attributed speech696writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageRuth Marcus • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Schmidt • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageEli Lake • 23 words • 0.0% coverageEli Lake • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageEli Lake • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Klavan • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRoberto Serrano • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRoberto Serrano • 30 words • 0.0% coverageRoberto Serrano • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageUnited States Central Command • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMitch McConnell • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageNew York Times • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageConor McGregor • 5 words • 0.0% coverageConor McGregor • 5 words • 0.0% coverageConor McGregor • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Steve Schmidt

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words9.5% of attributed speech45% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Steve Schmidt: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%Steve Schmidt: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%Steve Schmidt: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.0 ptsWriter: 2.0%Steve Schmidt: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.