Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Spector results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 1,565 hits . Analysis detected 9,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,996 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,600 of 6,135 authors). This David Spector is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group. David Spector
Author details
Total words: 5,996
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.9% percentile 3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.7% 18.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.1% 26.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.1% 20.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst