Speaker summary
26%9 analyzed articles/videos182.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.S. Forest Service results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 83.24 faulty-reasoning hits from 182.667 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (24,042 of 28,364 speakers). This U.S. Forest Service is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510015.2% percentile
11.8% BS Score9 analyzed videos182.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate