KUER0%

Los incendios forestales son caros. Si provocas uno, Utah y el gobierno federal te cobrarán 26%

By Macy Lipkin0%

6/30/2026, 12:10:52 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 1,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 742 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,312 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the article peer group.

While wildfires rage across Utah, state forester Jamie Barnes said this season is unlike anything Utah firefighters have seen before. 
“These are historic times, people,” she said Thursday while standing in Popperton Park near the University of Utah, where the Bonneville Fire came within 100 feet of the Huntsman Cancer Institute this month. 
That fire, which burned 566 acres, is small compared to the fires in central and southern Utah. 
With more than 240,000 total acres burned so far, this wildfire season has already far surpassed 2025’s 160,000 acres. 
And it’s only June. 
It’s difficult to estimate how much that has cost the state so far, but Barnes figures it’s north of $20 million. 
The 2025 fire year was the costliest on record in Utah, with more than $191 million in total costs. 
The federal government owns nearly two-thirds of Utah’s land and covered about 85% of the fire bill that year. 
Federal Emergency Management Agency grants are expected to cover 75% of the costs to contain the Iron and Cottonwood fires in Juab and Beaver counties, respectively. 
These grants cover firefighting, but not rebuilding, and the money can take years to arrive. 
Generally, fire suppression costs include things like firefighter salaries, equipment, land use and food and support at camps, the U.S. 
Forest Service wrote in an email in response to KUER questions. 
And those costs add up. 
A 20-person crew costs about $11,000 per day. 
Fighting fires from the air only adds to that cost: $2,100 per hour for a single-engine air tanker, $3,200 per hour for a heavy air tanker, according to a Forest Service spokesperson. 
Meanwhile, the state has $120 million set aside for fighting fires and assisting in recovery, Gov. 
Spencer Cox said at the press conference where he announced his state emergency order on fireworks. 
He made the statement alongside Barnes, first responders and civic leaders. 
Cox said the Iron Fire, which prompted evacuations in Eureka, is believed to have been caused by fireworks. 
“Obviously it was illegal fireworks, because you can’t light them at this time of year anyway,” he said. 
No matter how they start, starting fires can have legal consequences. 
For example, Salt Lake County is charging a man who allegedly started a fire in Memory Grove Park. 
County Mayor Jenny Wilson is asking residents to report fireworks-users and warns that the first offense carries a $1,000 fine. 
And the Utah Department of Public Safety is increasing patrols in high-risk areas, said Commissioner Beau Mason. 
The state has an attorney assigned to recover wildfire costs, Barnes noted. 
But getting reimbursements is complicated because people who start fires don’t necessarily have the money to pay for the damages. 
“It’s a balance between getting that money back and holding that person accountable,” she said. 
Since there’s no specific law regarding starting fires, it’s difficult to determine how much people have paid. 
When federal lands are involved, the U.S. 
Attorney’s Office gets involved. 
Melissa Holyoak, U.S. attorney for the District of Utah, told KUER in an interview that her office often handles minor matters, like someone leaving a campfire unattended. 
Even if a fire isn’t started, they take legal action because of the high risk. 
“We want to make sure, especially from a deterrence perspective, that people actually put out these fires,” Holyoak said. 
Prosecuting for arson is uncommon because it’s difficult to prove intent to start a fire, Holyoak said, pointing to the Palisades Fire in California. 
Regardless of whether someone did it on purpose, Holyoak said her office will sue to recover some money. 
Even if a person can’t pay, their homeowner’s insurance might. 
“We’re unfortunately recovering pennies on the dollar, but we do recover amounts that help,” Holyoak said. 
Investigations can take years, but she said the high cost makes these cases a priority. 
Once a fire is underway, Holyoak worries that drones will interfere with firefighting efforts. 
When drones fly, aircraft must stay grounded. 
A conviction for drone interference could carry up to two years in prison, she said. 
If someone gets hurt, the sentence could be much longer. 
“Fires can continue to grow, and every minute counts in these cases.” 
Macy Lipkin is a Report for America corps member working for KUER in northern Utah. 
This report was translated by artificial intelligence and edited by Edgar Zúñiga of Avanza 88.3, Utah’s first bilingual public radio station. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.4%Macy Lipkin: 2.4%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias2.4%This article: 2.6%Macy Lipkin: 2.0%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias2.6%This article: 11.9%Macy Lipkin: 4.3%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic11.9%This article: 5.9%Macy Lipkin: 1.0%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic5.9%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Macy Lipkin: 1.6%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias2.8%This article: 5.7%Macy Lipkin: 5.8%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect5.7%This article: 4.2%Macy Lipkin: 1.4%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion4.2%This article: 5.1%Macy Lipkin: 1.2%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias5.1%This article: 2.7%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect2.7%This article: 7.0%Macy Lipkin: 5.1%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias7.0%This article: 3.2%Macy Lipkin: 2.1%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 14.0%Macy Lipkin: 5.6%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias14.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 1.6%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Macy Lipkin: 0.8%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error5.1%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Macy Lipkin: 1.2%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.5%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.5%This article: 2.7%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.4%Macy Lipkin: 4.6%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority9.4%This article: 3.8%Macy Lipkin: 1.5%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma3.8%This article: 3.2%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope3.2%This article: 0.7%Macy Lipkin: 0.3%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.7%This article: 2.7%Macy Lipkin: 3.6%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization2.7%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.3%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon2.3%This article: 8.1%Macy Lipkin: 4.6%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion8.1%This article: 5.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.6%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question5.0%This article: 0.9%Macy Lipkin: 2.2%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.9%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.4%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.8%Macy Lipkin: 3.9%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal9.8%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.9%Macy Lipkin: 1.7%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.9%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground2.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.4%Macy Lipkin: 0.8%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 4.4%Macy Lipkin: 1.4%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice4.4%This article: 8.4%Macy Lipkin: 0.9%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination8.4%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.5%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Macy Lipkin: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Macy Lipkin: 0.7%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.5%

742 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers60%attributed speech296writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Barnes • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Barnes • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Barnes • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Forest Service • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Forest Service • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Cox • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Cox • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSpencer Cox • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageSalt Lake County • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJenny Wilson • 20 words • 100.0% coverageBeau Mason • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Barnes • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Barnes • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 19 words • 100.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMelissa Holyoak • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

U.S. Forest Service

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words9.6% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +25.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%U.S. Forest Service: 25.6%25.6%Indoctrination-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%U.S. Forest Service: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.