Author summary
9% 2 analyzed articles/videos 395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meg Wingerter results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 261 hits . Analysis detected 1,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,226 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (5,795 of 6,628 authors). This Meg Wingerter is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Meg Wingerter
Author details
Total words: 5,226
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst