Speaker summary
35%6 analyzed articles/videos314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tree Paine results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 74.157 hits. Analysis detected 281.293 faulty-reasoning hits from 314 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (25,143 of 27,186 speakers). This Tree Paine is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.5% percentile
8.2% BS Score6 analyzed videos314 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate