Speaker summary
80% 8 analyzed articles/videos 567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tammy Duckworth results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 48.3% saturation with 274.021 hits . Analysis detected 2,082.399 faulty-reasoning hits from 567 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,205 of 28,364 speakers). This Tammy Duckworth is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Tammy Duckworth
Speaker details
Total words: 567
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 8.2% BS Score8 analyzed videos567 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 48.3% 48.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 28.0% 28.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.0% Red Herring: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.4% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst