Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These MATTHEW PERRONE results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 2,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,498 authors). This MATTHEW PERRONE is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
MATTHEW PERRONE
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%MATTHEW PERRONE (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,184
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.7%11.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.0%7.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos