BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 1,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 796 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (13,403 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON (AP)  Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Wednesday that he is rolling out a new screening program for “testosterone deficiency” among troops, calling it necessary to allow them to operate at their “absolute best.” 
The screenings will be conducted annually as part of service members’ required medical screenings for those 30 and older, he said. 
Troops under 30 can volunteer to be tested. 
In a video on social media, Hegseth said receiving testosterone replacement therapy would be voluntary. 
In the video, Hegseth simply refers to troops, though it appears he is talking about only testing men in uniform for hormone irregularities. 
The move comes as other Trump administration officials have begun to advocate for men to have easier access to testosterone replacement therapies, but the messaging from Hegseth and others blends known science on the hormone with broader, and less substantiated, claims. 
Testosterone use in the military has previously come under scrutiny 
When asked what conditions Hegseth was looking to address with the new policy, the Pentagon referred to Hegseth’s remarks in the video that mentioned keeping troops “strong, resilient and capable” and that the rigors of the modern battlefield demand “maximum psychological and mental readiness.” 
Over the past several years, special operations troops  and specifically Navy SEALs  have come under scrutiny for their use of testosterone and similar substances to enhance performance. 
A year after the recruit’s death, the Navy said it would begin a drug-testing program to screen for “any hormonal substance, chemically or pharmacologically related to testosterone, that promotes muscle growth.” 
Hegseth said his new initiative is “not about artificial enhancement.” 
The Pentagon did not respond to questions about what research or academic studies underpinned the move. 
It also didn’t say if female troops would be able to be evaluated for estrogen-based therapy as they entered perimenopause. 
RFK Jr. has touted testosterone, but medical experts are wary 
Testosterone levels in men decline naturally with age and have long been linked to issues like erectile dysfunction, low libido, mood changes and weight gain. 
But experts have debated for years how to diagnose those problems and whether they should be treated by replacing the hormone. 
Hegseth’s announcement comes as Health Secretary Robert F. 
Kennedy Jr. and other Trump administration officials are moving to make it easier for doctors to prescribe testosterone. 
Last month, the Food and Drug Administration proposed easing prescribing limits on testosterone gels, pills, patches and injections. 
The current FDA label specifies that the medications are only for men with hypogonadism, a medical condition that causes drastically low testosterone. 
But many influencers and proponents of Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” movement tout testosterone as a way to look younger, build muscle and stay mentally sharp  although those uses aren’t accepted by most medical experts. 
Still, recent studies have bolstered the case for testosterone’s benefits, for certain conditions, while allaying worries about its safety  particularly concerns about heart safety. 
Last year, the FDA removed a boxed warning about possible risks of heart attack and stroke from the drugs. 
However, current medical guidelines generally recommend against blanket testing of testosterone levels. 
Typically, doctors are advised to discuss testosterone therapy with men who have troubling symptoms and documented low levels of the hormone on two separate blood tests. 
Testing for testosterone is challenging because levels of the hormone fluctuate throughout the day. 
Accurate testosterone readings are typically measured in the morning after fasting. 
Some female Democratic lawmakers with military experience blast the new policy 
Sen. 
Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat and Iraq War veteran, said the announcement sounded “like gender-affirming care to me,” referencing Hegseth’s stance against transgender troops. 
Rep. 
Chrissy Houlahan, a Pennsylvania Democrat and Air Force veteran, said it “proves that Secretary Hegseth takes direction from the far corners of the manosphere.” 
Both lawmakers called on Hegseth to make hormone testing available for both men and women. 
“Let’s extend hormone screenings for all of our brave servicemembers to help us identify fertility issues early  since studies show that both women and men in our military disproportionately face higher rates of infertility than the general population,” Duckworth, who is on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in a statement. 
Hegseth has previously said he does not believe women should hold combat roles and that those positions should be based on the “highest male standard.” 
He has blocked some military promotions for women or fired female leaders since becoming Pentagon leader. 
He has made other changes related to the medical treatment of troops. 
In April, he announced the repeal of the military’s long-standing flu vaccine mandate, citing “medical autonomy” and religious freedom. 
In June, a flu outbreak at the U.S. 
Air Force’s boot camp sickened at least nearly 300 people. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 2.0%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.6%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Konstantin Toropin: 2.9%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic6.2%This article: 2.9%Konstantin Toropin: 0.7%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.9%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 3.6%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Konstantin Toropin: 10.6%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect7.4%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.6%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.3%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Konstantin Toropin: 2.8%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 2.1%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 20.6%Konstantin Toropin: 9.2%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias20.6%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 2.3%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Konstantin Toropin: 2.1%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 1.1%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.7%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Konstantin Toropin: 1.2%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.2%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem3.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.3%Konstantin Toropin: 4.9%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority16.3%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 1.1%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 5.5%Konstantin Toropin: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning5.5%This article: 5.7%Konstantin Toropin: 2.6%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.3%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.7%Konstantin Toropin: 6.3%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion12.7%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.4%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.9%Konstantin Toropin: 2.7%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.9%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.5%Konstantin Toropin: 0.3%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof6.5%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.4%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.2%Konstantin Toropin: 1.4%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.2%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.6%Konstantin Toropin: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground2.6%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.1%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 3.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy3.0%This article: 6.5%Konstantin Toropin: 2.2%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote6.5%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 1.3%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.4%Konstantin Toropin: 1.5%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice6.4%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.8%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 12.6%Konstantin Toropin: 0.3%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias12.6%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Konstantin Toropin: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

796 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers13%attributed speech696writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageTammy Duckworth • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageChrissy Houlahan • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTammy Duckworth • 52 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Tammy Duckworth

100%flagged-word coverage
76 attributed words76% of attributed speech62% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Tammy Duckworth: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+68.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Tammy Duckworth: 68.4%68.4%Biased Writer Voice-7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Tammy Duckworth: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.