Keyword summary
30% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Food And Drug Administration results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 802 hits . Analysis detected 7,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,980 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (30,665 of 34,746 keywords). This U S Food And Drug Administration is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. U S Food And Drug Administration
Keyword details
Total words: 10,980
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst