Keyword summary
92%5 analyzed articles/videos1,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tammy Duckworth results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 2,997 hits. Analysis detected 21,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,862 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,597 of 37,536 keywords). This Tammy Duckworth is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Tammy Duckworth
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Tammy Duckworth (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.4% percentile
3.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 23.3%23.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate