BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Indoctrination, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 832 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.2% and a BS Rank of 44% (12,293 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the article peer group.

A former U.S. 
Army combat surgeon with backing from Rep. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, streamer Hasan Piker, and an anti-AIPAC super PAC won a New Jersey primary on Tuesday despite last-minute negative attacks. 
Adam Hamawy beat a crowded field of Democrats in the state’s 12th Congressional District. 
The winner of the primary is expected to coast to victory over Republican Gregg Mele in the November general election. 
His victory came despite a flurry of right-wing media reports that sought to tarnish the progressive candidate as an Islamic extremist because of his 1995 trial testimony for a religious leader convicted of plotting terror attacks. 
Hamawy said he was being targeted with outdated “tropes” as a Muslim in politics. 
His campaign, which was supercharged by an ad campaign from the independent super PAC American Priorities, demonstrated the growing influence of pro-Palestine donors in contested Democratic primaries. 
Hamawy stood out among the 13 candidates in the race vying to replace retiring Democratic Rep. 
Bonnie Watson Coleman because of his compelling backstory and the large ad spend on his behalf by American Priorities, the super PAC founded to counter AIPAC’s influence in Democratic politics. 
Working as a combat surgeon in Iraq in 2004, Hamawy helped save the life of Sen. 
Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., when her helicopter was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade, which led to the loss of both her legs. 
In 2024, he also went to Gaza to provide medical aid to Palestinians wounded by Israeli forces and was temporarily trapped there after Israel closed the Rafah border crossing. 
When the crossing was reopened, Hamawy was among a small group who refused to leave on demands that more medical workers be let in. 
Pointing to his experience as a physician, Hamawy staked out policy positions that included support for Medicare for All, abolishing ICE, and opposing military aid to Israel. 
He drew endorsements from Sen. 
Bernie Sanders, the Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC, and the Sunrise Movement, in addition to Ocasio-Cortez. 
In a joint statement, two progressive, pro-Palestine groups hailed Hamawy’s win. 
The Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project and Justice Democrats said they spent a combined $200,000 in support of his campaign. 
“Voters were drawn to Dr. 
Hamawy’s candidacy because he knows firsthand the reality of Israel’s genocide in Gaza like few do  having worked to save the lives of Palestinian children under bombardment and unimaginable conditions,” the groups wrote. 
“His experience is necessary in Congress now more than ever, as too many of the people meant to represent us continue to look the other way while our tax dollars fund injustices here and abroad.” 
Trailing Hamawy was East Brunswick Mayor Brad Cohen, a centrist with the backing of his county party who ran as a pro-Israel candidate. 
Hamawy competed for the progressive vote against Sue Altman, a longtime activist in New Jersey who served until recently as the state director for Democratic Sen. 
Andy Kim. 
Her endorsements included former Sen. 
Bill Bradley and the New Jersey Working Families Party, which she previously led from 2019 to 2023. 
She ran far behind Hamawy. 
Hamawy’s win was a notable accomplishment for American Priorities, which only launched in February. 
The group’s first major pick, Nida Allam, fell just short of toppling incumbent Democratic Rep. 
Valerie Foushee in North Carolina. 
It had better luck in Pennsylvania, where progressive state Rep. 
Chris Rabb won his district’s Democratic primary last month. 
Hamawy’s campaign represented an even bigger test for American Priorities, since he was a first-time politician with a relatively low profile before launching his campaign. 
The group said at the end of April that it was planning to spend $2 million to boost Hamawy. 
Hamawy was polling at only 5 percent of the electorate in a March 30–April 1 poll sponsored by his campaign. 
By the first week of May, however, the outside support helped power him to first place, with 19 percent support compared to Altman’s 12 percent, according to another poll sponsored by his campaign. 
The wide-open nature of the primary and large number of undecided voters helped make it hard to gauge who had the edge. 
Further complicating matters was a surge of negative press focusing on the brief testimony Hamawy, then 26, gave at the 1995 trial of Omar Abdel-Rahman, commonly known as the “The Blind Sheikh,” who was convicted of planning terror attacks. 
Hamawy said he had known Abdel-Rahman as a leader in the Egyptian community in New Jersey and condemned extremism of all stripes. 
He noted his own long service for the U.S. military as well as his experience as a first responder during the September 11, 2001 attacks. 
“Any Muslim is going to be called a terrorist at some point, and these tropes are outdated and worn. 
Unfortunately, they continue to be used right now,” Hamawy told the New Jersey Monitor. 
“These are not serious arguments, and they’re getting old.” 
*This developing story has been updated. 
* 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.3%Matt Sledge: 2.8%The Intercept: 5.3%Confirmation Bias10.3%This article: 2.4%Matt Sledge: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.5%Anchoring Bias2.4%This article: 4.1%Matt Sledge: 2.4%The Intercept: 3.0%Availability Heuristic4.1%This article: 1.2%Matt Sledge: 1.1%The Intercept: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.8%The Intercept: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Matt Sledge: 11.2%The Intercept: 9.2%Framing Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Matt Sledge: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.0%Optimism Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 1.5%The Intercept: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.2%Matt Sledge: 11.8%The Intercept: 12.3%Negativity Bias19.2%This article: 3.2%Matt Sledge: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 3.6%Matt Sledge: 1.4%The Intercept: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error3.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Matt Sledge: 1.8%The Intercept: 1.7%In-Group Bias1.3%This article: 2.8%Matt Sledge: 1.0%The Intercept: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.8%This article: 1.9%Matt Sledge: 1.1%The Intercept: 1.0%Halo Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Matt Sledge: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.3%Recency Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Matt Sledge: 2.7%The Intercept: 2.4%Ad Hominem4.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.9%The Intercept: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%Matt Sledge: 2.9%The Intercept: 3.4%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 2.0%The Intercept: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 1.5%The Intercept: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.3%Matt Sledge: 5.8%The Intercept: 7.2%Hasty Generalization2.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.1%Matt Sledge: 6.3%The Intercept: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion4.1%This article: 4.2%Matt Sledge: 1.6%The Intercept: 1.4%Begging the Question4.2%This article: 4.0%Matt Sledge: 2.6%The Intercept: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 1.1%The Intercept: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 1.1%The Intercept: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Sledge: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.6%Matt Sledge: 2.6%The Intercept: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.6%This article: 0.6%Matt Sledge: 2.0%The Intercept: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.6%This article: 6.1%Matt Sledge: 8.3%The Intercept: 10.5%Biased Writer Voice6.1%This article: 8.3%Matt Sledge: 1.4%The Intercept: 2.1%Indoctrination8.3%This article: 21.8%Matt Sledge: 4.8%The Intercept: 6.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias21.8%This article: 2.8%Matt Sledge: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.8%This article: 3.2%Matt Sledge: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.2%

832 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers14%attributed speech713writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageAdam Hamawy • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageInstitute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAmerican Priorities • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageAdam Hamawy • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Hamawy • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Hamawy • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Hamawy • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Adam Hamawy

42%flagged-word coverage
78 attributed words66% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Politically Left Leaning B-25.4 ptsWriter: 25.4%Adam Hamawy: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-9.7 ptsWriter: 9.7%Adam Hamawy: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%Adam Hamawy: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Adam Hamawy: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Adam Hamawy: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-0.7 ptsWriter: 0.7%Adam Hamawy: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.7 ptsWriter: 0.7%Adam Hamawy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.