Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pro Palestine results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,497 hits . Analysis detected 10,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,018 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,823 of 37,536 keywords). This Pro Palestine is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Pro Palestine
Keyword details
Total words: 10,018
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst