Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Democrats results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 2,659 hits . Analysis detected 23,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,536 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (18,866 of 34,834 keywords). This Justice Democrats is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group. Justice Democrats
Keyword details
Total words: 17,536
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst