Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New Jersey Working Families Party results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 575 hits. Analysis detected 2,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This New Jersey Working Families Party is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
New Jersey Working Families Party
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,328
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos