Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sen. Tammy Duckworth results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 65.3% saturation with 1,920 hits . Analysis detected 12,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,942 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of ā 98% (183 of 6,360 authors). This Sen. Tammy Duckworth is worse (more manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Sen. Tammy Duckworth
Author details
Total words: 2,942
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.1% percentile 14.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 65.3% 65.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 32.1% 32.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 34.3% 34.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 49.8% 49.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 22.6% 22.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 16.4% 16.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 33.7% 33.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 24.8% 24.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 19.0% 19.0% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Author 14.4% 14.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Author 65.3%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 49.8%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 34.3%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Author 33.7%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 32.1%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 24.8%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Author 22.6%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Author 19.0%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 16.4%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Author 15.9%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 14.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 12.2%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 11.4%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Tu Quoque: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst