Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Keerti Gopal results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 312 hits . Analysis detected 2,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,686 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Keerti Gopal is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Keerti Gopal
Author details
Total words: 3,686
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst