Speaker summary
72% 11 analyzed articles/videos 987 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Savannah Guthrie results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Optimism Bias , and Special Pleading , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 42.5% saturation with 418.984 hits . Analysis detected 1,531.613 faulty-reasoning hits from 987 analyzed words across 11 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,728 of 28,364 speakers). This Savannah Guthrie is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group. Savannah Guthrie
Speaker details
Total words: 987
Content count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.2% percentile 4.7% BS Score11 analyzed videos987 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 42.5% 42.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Special Pleading: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.3% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst