Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah-Jane Collins results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 855 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,525 of 6,259 authors). This Sarah-Jane Collins is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Sarah-Jane Collins
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
76%Sarah-Jane Collins (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,308
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos