Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 971 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Siladitya Ray results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Recency Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 582 hits . Analysis detected 3,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,884 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,593 of 6,244 authors). This Siladitya Ray is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Siladitya Ray
Author details
Total words: 3,884
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.5% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst