Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Paul Farrell results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 314 hits . Analysis detected 1,772 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,644 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Paul Farrell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Paul Farrell
Author details
Total words: 3,644
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst