Speaker summary
56% 9 analyzed articles/videos 627.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rahm Emanuel results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 194.187 hits . Analysis detected 1,583.784 faulty-reasoning hits from 627.333 analyzed words across 9 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (24,240 of 26,781 speakers). This Rahm Emanuel is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Rahm Emanuel
Speaker details
Total words: 627.333
Content count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.5% percentile 9.1% BS Score9 analyzed videos627.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 27.6% 27.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 15.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Middle Ground: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst