Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Nichols results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 830 hits. Analysis detected 6,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,774 of 6,629 authors). This Adam Nichols is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Adam Nichols
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
74%Adam Nichols (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,544
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.6%14.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 18.3%18.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 18.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos