Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Duss results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.3% saturation with 2,444 hits . Analysis detected 12,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,950 of 6,420 authors). This Matthew Duss is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Matthew Duss
Author details
Total words: 7,804
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.6% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 31.3% 31.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 22.5% 22.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.3% 15.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.9% 5.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 22.5%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst