Speaker summary
40% 61 analyzed articles/videos 1,149.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pentagon results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 297.867 hits . Analysis detected 2,432.299 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,149.333 analyzed words across 61 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,960 of 28,364 speakers). This Pentagon is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Pentagon
Speaker details
Total words: 1,149.333
Article count: 61
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 4.0% BS Score61 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 19.9% 19.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst