Speaker summary
68% 14 analyzed articles/videos 1,496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nithya Raman results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Status Quo Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 354.129 hits . Analysis detected 3,119.778 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,496 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,551 of 28,364 speakers). This Nithya Raman is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Nithya Raman
Speaker details
Total words: 1,496
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 5.2% BS Score14 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 23.7% 23.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 8.1% Straw Man: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst