Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 205 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uwa Ede-Osifo results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 805 hits . Analysis detected 4,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,703 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,024 of 6,361 authors). This Uwa Ede-Osifo is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. Uwa Ede-Osifo
Author details
Total words: 3,703
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.2% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst