Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Dani Anguiano results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 720 hits. Analysis detected 4,737 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,843 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,360 authors). This Dani Anguiano is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Dani Anguiano
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Dani Anguiano (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,843
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.9%14.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos