Homelessness in LA is once again on the rise 60%

By Hillel Aron46%

7/23/2026, 5:18:41 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 1,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 737 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 56% and a BS Rank of 60% (8,827 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the article peer group.

LOS ANGELES (CN)  Homelessness rose in LA compared to last year, following two consecutive years of the number going down. 
Mayor Karen Bass blamed the disappointing results of the homeless count, performed in January and set to be formally announced Friday, on cuts to state and federal funding. 
“For two years straight, we drove down homelessness by historic margins  but as expected, last year our efforts ultimately couldn’t keep up with policies and funding cuts at the federal and state levels that pushed more people onto the streets,” Bass said in a written statement. 
In particular, she blamed the Trump administration, which she said had “driven up the cost of gas, groceries and rent  pushing more families to the edge  and slashed critical safety net funding.” 
The Los Angeles Homeless Service Authority (LAHSA) had scheduled a Friday afternoon press conference to announce the results of the 2026 count, a legally mandated “point in time count” used to calculate the number of men and women living on the streets, in shelters and without a home in the city and county. 
When the count yields positive news, as it did last year , elected officials are on hand to proudly trumpet their success. 
This year’s announcement was set to be made by two LAHSA officials. 
On Thursday, the results of the count were leaked to the media. 
Local news station Fox 11 reported homelessness had risen by roughly 3.5%, while the number of unsheltered homeless  arguably the more important figure  had risen by about 8%. 
Those numbers were confirmed by the Los Angeles Times. 
The count results are a blow to Bass, who is running for reelection. 
Her 2022 election was based primarily on fighting homelessness, which had been rising in both the city and county for more than a decade. 
Once in office, it was by far her top priority. 
She declared a state of emergency and enacted a signature program, Inside Safe, which concentrated on clearing encampments and pushing those living in them into shelters. 
The approach seemed to working; homelessness fell 2% in 2024, and 3% in 2025. 
“We have reduced homelessness in Los Angeles by 11% since 2023  placing tens of thousands of Angelenos in interim housing, moving 6,000 people off the streets through Inside Safe, and housing more than 1,000 homeless veterans,” Bass said in her statement. 
Not everyone was convinced. 
Spencer Pratt, a former reality television show villain, ran a very loud and boisterous primary campaign based largely on homelessness and crime, which he depicted as out of control. 
Bass defended her record, pointing to the homeless count results as proof that the city was finally on the right track. 
In the end, Pratt finished third, well behind both Bass and City Councilwoman Nithya Raman, who will face each other in a November runoff. 
Raman, too, has made fighting homelessness her key issue throughout her political career. 
She has often argued for a softer approach, favoring outreach and increased services to seeps and encampment removals. 
She opposes a law that allows City Council to declare certain areas, particularly places near schools and parks, “encampment-free zones.” 
Raman has not issued a comment on the count’s results. 
Much of the criticism around LA’s approach to fighting homelessness has been around waste, fraud and abuse. 
Several nonprofit affordable housing developers have been accused of financial malfeasance, or outright fraud, and LAHSA itself has come under fire too. 
Last month, the Trump administration moved to suspend the joint city-county authority from receiving federal funds. 
LAHSA is suing to stop that effort. 
But the agency is also being hit from Democrats closer to home. 
The LA County Board of Supervisors voted in 2025 to pull hundreds of millions of dollars out of LAHSA and shift the money to a new agency. 
In her statement, Bass also took aim at the beleaguered authority. 
“We also have to be clear-eyed about what’s not working,” Bass wrote. 
“For 30 years, this city has run its homeless response through LAHSA  and audits and the courts have now made plain what too many Angelenos already saw: the money wasn’t tracked, providers went unpaid, and public trust eroded. 
I’m not going to defend a broken system. 
The city must build something better  results-driven, transparent, and centered around the people we’re trying to help, not the bureaucracy.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.1%Hillel Aron: 8.8%Courthouse News: 3.4%Confirmation Bias11.1%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 2.1%Courthouse News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.7%Hillel Aron: 3.8%Courthouse News: 2.4%Availability Heuristic8.7%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 1.1%Courthouse News: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 9.6%Hillel Aron: 1.3%Courthouse News: 0.6%Hindsight Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 1.1%Courthouse News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Hillel Aron: 4.8%Courthouse News: 6.9%Framing Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.2%Courthouse News: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Hillel Aron: 0.4%Courthouse News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect3.5%This article: 4.7%Hillel Aron: 0.8%Courthouse News: 0.8%Optimism Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 1.4%Courthouse News: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.7%Hillel Aron: 9.7%Courthouse News: 9.2%Negativity Bias19.7%This article: 25.1%Hillel Aron: 8.3%Courthouse News: 3.6%Self-Serving Bias25.1%This article: 3.8%Hillel Aron: 0.8%Courthouse News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error3.8%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.2%Courthouse News: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Hillel Aron: 0.4%Courthouse News: 0.7%In-Group Bias3.9%This article: 4.6%Hillel Aron: 0.5%Courthouse News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.6%This article: 5.7%Hillel Aron: 0.8%Courthouse News: 0.6%Halo Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%Hillel Aron: 0.8%Courthouse News: 1.0%Recency Bias2.8%This article: 3.3%Hillel Aron: 0.7%Courthouse News: 0.6%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 1.6%Hillel Aron: 0.3%Courthouse News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias1.6%This article: 3.9%Hillel Aron: 0.8%Courthouse News: 0.8%Ad Hominem3.9%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.5%Hillel Aron: 1.5%Courthouse News: 2.3%Appeal to Authority6.5%This article: 2.8%Hillel Aron: 0.6%Courthouse News: 1.0%False Dilemma2.8%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.0%Hillel Aron: 2.0%Courthouse News: 3.1%Hasty Generalization6.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.1%Courthouse News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.8%Hillel Aron: 3.0%Courthouse News: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion1.8%This article: 1.1%Hillel Aron: 1.8%Courthouse News: 1.2%Begging the Question1.1%This article: 18.6%Hillel Aron: 4.3%Courthouse News: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.6%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.4%Courthouse News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.7%Courthouse News: 0.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.1%Hillel Aron: 1.6%Courthouse News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.1%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.7%Hillel Aron: 1.6%Courthouse News: 1.3%Unattributed Quote8.7%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 1.6%Courthouse News: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 16.7%Hillel Aron: 5.3%Courthouse News: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice16.7%This article: 10.2%Hillel Aron: 1.9%Courthouse News: 0.9%Indoctrination10.2%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.9%Courthouse News: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hillel Aron: 0.0%Courthouse News: 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

737 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers34%attributed speech483writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Karen Bass • 28 words • 100.0% coverageMayor Karen Bass • 47 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Karen Bass • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageMayor Karen Bass • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageTrump administration • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLAHSA • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Karen Bass • 12 words • 100.0% coverageMayor Karen Bass • 39 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Karen Bass • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Karen Bass • 21 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mayor Karen Bass

100%flagged-word coverage
231 attributed words91% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Indoctrination+32.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mayor Karen Bass: 32.5%32.5%Biased Writer Voice-7.5 ptsWriter: 19.7%Mayor Karen Bass: 12.1%12.1%Unattributed Quote+13.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Mayor Karen Bass: 18.2%18.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.