Speaker summary
52% 19 analyzed articles/videos 726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy Mace results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 184.637 hits . Analysis detected 1,594.043 faulty-reasoning hits from 726 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (26,076 of 26,730 speakers). This Nancy Mace is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group. Nancy Mace
Speaker details
Total words: 726
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.4% percentile 4.9% BS Score19 analyzed videos726 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst