Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathleen Creedon results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 1,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,853 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,326 of 6,628 authors). This Kathleen Creedon is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Kathleen Creedon
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
50%Kathleen Creedon (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,853
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 9.2%9.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos