MS NOW⁠95%

2 pilots killed in collision between plane and vehicle at LaGuardia Airport ⁠0%

By Kathleen Creedon⁠0%

3/23/2026, 5:46:08 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 231 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Two people were killed in a collision between Air Canada Flight 8646 and a Port Authority Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (AARF) vehicle at LaGuardia International Airport late Sunday night. 
Port Authority Executive Director Kathryn Garcia confirmed that the two fatalities were the aircraft’s pilots. 
Forty one people were transferred to local hospitals, including the two officers on board the AARF vehicle, Garcia said at a press conference early Monday morning. 
Nine people remain hospitalized with injuries considered “serious.” 
All 72 passengers aboard the aircraft have been accounted for, Garcia said. 
The aircraft — a Jazz Aviation flight operating on behalf of Air Canada Express — had been cleared to land. 
The emergency vehicle had also received clearance from the control center to cross the runway to respond to a separate incident. 
Moments before the crash, an air controller could be heard on radio transmission trying to stop the emergency vehicle from continuing after clearance was given. 
The National Transportation Safety Board has not yet confirmed the speed of the aircraft upon collision but is currently on site conducting an investigation. 
The New York Police Department announced all streets and highway exits into the airport would be closed until further notice. 
Officials also said the airport would be closed until at least 2 p.m. 
Monday. 
This is a developing story. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 7.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 1.6%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 1.1%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.9%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 2.7%MS NOW: 15.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.7%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.6%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.4%MS NOW: 19.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 2.5%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 9.1%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 4.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 5.7%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.3%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 8.1%MS NOW: 9.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 1.6%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 1.1%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 14.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathleen Creedon: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

231 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers42%attributed speech134writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageKathryn Garcia • 15 words • 0.0% coverageKathryn Garcia • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageKathryn Garcia • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageThe National Transportation Safety Board • 24 words • 0.0% coverageThe New York Police Department • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kathryn Garcia

0%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words55% of attributed speech0% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.