Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,062 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New-York results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 432 hits . Analysis detected 2,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (9,977 of 15,753 topics). This New-York is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. New-York
Topic details
Total words: 4,248
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst