Speaker summary
58% 14 analyzed articles/videos 1,925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Lawler results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Status Quo Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 382.135 hits . Analysis detected 3,453.061 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,925 analyzed words across 14 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,997 of 28,364 speakers). This Mike Lawler is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Mike Lawler
Speaker details
Total words: 1,925
Content count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 3.8% BS Score14 analyzed videos1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst