Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,590 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Gould results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 803 hits . Analysis detected 6,880 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,110 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,174 of 6,170 authors). This Joe Gould is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Joe Gould
Author details
Total words: 10,110
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst