Publication summary
0% 21 analyzed articles/videos 14,986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NOTUS results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 6,675 hits . Analysis detected 51,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,694 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 35% (267 of 410 publications). This NOTUS is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 63,694
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score21 analyzed articles63.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst