Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Neukam results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 230 hits . Analysis detected 1,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,910 of 6,611 authors). This Stephen Neukam is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Stephen Neukam
Author details
Total words: 1,344
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.1% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.7% 2.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst