NOTUS0%

Big Lobbying Spenders Are Going All Out at the Great American State Fair 45%

By Dave Levinthal0%

7/3/2026, 9:17:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 1,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,099 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (11,465 of 20,516 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the article peer group.

K Street  the traditional Washington lobbyists redoubt  runs a mile north of the National Mall. 
But this week, K Street seems to stretch clear across the grassy expanse between the Washington Monument and the U.S. 
Capitol, which is hosting the Great American State Fair  the Trump-backed, MAGA-coded exposition celebrating the nation’s 250th birthday. 
During a three-hour fairgrounds tour, NOTUS spotted the presence of dozens of corporations and special interest groups representing a who’s who of influence peddlers, many with serious money behind their lobbying efforts. 
These companies and organizations collectively spent more than $152 million in 2025 on formal efforts to lobby the U.S. federal government, according to a NOTUS analysis of federal lobbying disclosure records and data compiled by nonpartisan research organization OpenSecrets. 
Their executives and political action committees have meanwhile donated many millions of dollars more this decade to political candidates’ campaigns, national party committees and super PACs. 
Corporate messaging hits fast at the Great American State Fair: Fairgoers entering near the Smithsonian Metro station checkpoint are immediately greeted with a walled tent adorned with “America Innovates” banners. 
Inside, the air-conditioned tent had the feel of a trade show with no particularly unifying theme and certain foreign undertones. 
Visitors to the tent first encounter an exhibit for SAP, a German multinational business software company that spent nearly $4 million last year through its U.S. subsidiary on federal-level lobbying. 
A large display features the corporate logos of a dozen companies  Visa, Xerox, IBM, Honeywell and Hershey, among others  under a statement in blue lettering: “America’s leading companies. 
Powered by SAP.” 
TikTok’s exhibit is nearby. 
“Buy small. 
Build big. 
Shop America,” urges a black placard. 
“Like what you see? 
It’s all on TikTok Shop,” reads a red sign in the shape of a price tag. 
TikTok was owned until earlier this year by Chinese company ByteDance, which retains a minority ownership stake in an American entity that now owns TikTok’s U.S. operations. 
During the first three months of 2026, the new TikTok company spent $620,000 to lobby the federal government  on top of more than $8 million ByteDance spent in 2025. 
SpaceX ($2.94 million in 2025 lobbying expenditures), Axiom Space ($570,000), and President Donald Trump’s social media platform Truth Social rounded out the tent, alongside an outfit that creates custom motorcycles. 
In the separate “Made in America” tent a walk east down the National Mall, Micron ($3.94 million in 2025 lobbying spending), John Deere ($2.2 million), Biz2Credit ($200,000) each stood up booths or displays. 
Outside, Chime Financial, which spent $1.72 million on federal lobbying last year, offered a free cell phone charging station  and information about its partnership with Trump Accounts, the government-backed investment program for families with newborns. 
Large video boards ring the national mall with sponsorship promotions from companies that together spent well into the eight-figure range annually on federal lobbying. 
“Great American State Fair presented by Chevron.” 
“Great America State Fair presented by ExxonMobil.” 
Defense contractors Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and GE Aerospace also had their turns in the video board rotation. 
So, too, did phosphate and potash mining company Mosaic ($1.31 million in 2025 lobbying) and agriculture and lawn products manufacturer ScottsMiracle-Gro ($670,000). 
Anheuser-Busch, which has systematically sought to win back MAGA faithful after a financially disastrous Bud Light ad campaign in 2023, was just about everywhere at the Great American State Fair. 
Its suds were sold at concession stands and an “Anheuser-Busch Beer Car” was positioned near one of the fair’s music stages. 
Other Great American State Fair promotions by Washington lobbying forces are more subtle. 
The small pavilion for Puerto Rico is awash in rum, with bottles of Bacardi  it spent about $500,000 on lobbying last year  and other brands beckoning from shelves that visitors aren’t allowed to touch. 
In the Oklahoma pavilion, the National Basketball Association, NBC and Peacock logos are plastered to a pedestal topped by a gigantic Oklahoma City Thunder basketball. 
(NBC parent company Comcast spent nearly $12.9 million on federal lobbying in 2025.) 
NOTUS contacted two dozen of the corporations and organizations with the most significant exhibits or displays at the Great American State Fair. 
Most did not respond to questions, including why they’re participating and how much money they paid to do so. 
Freedom 250, the Trump-backed nonprofit organization staging the fair, also did not respond to a request for comment. 
Those that did respond offered only general statements. 
SAP spokesperson Victoria Dixon said in an email that the company’s partnership with Freedom 250 and America250  a separate, bipartisan organization  “reflect our long‑standing commitment to supporting innovation, economic strength, and workforce development in the communities where our customers, employees, and partners live and work.” 
As for its financial arrangement with the Great American State Fair? 
“We do not comment on sponsorship amounts, pricing, or contract terms associated with our sponsorships or partnerships,” Dixon said. 
“As a proud American company, Chevron is pleased to support celebrations of 250 years of the country’s independence,” said Bill Turenne, spokesperson for the oil company that spent $8.26 million on lobbying last year. 
“Axiom Space was invited to participate in the Great American State Fair and showcase our efforts to support the future of American space exploration,” the company said in a statement. 
Exiger, a government contractor that provides AI-powered supply chain services, “participated because we are an American AI company and we love that the Freedom 250 team is championing innovation,” spokesperson Kody Gurfein told NOTUS. 
“We did this to be a part of the biggest celebration of innovation in the U.S.  a once-in-a-generation celebration of the people, technologies, and ideas shaping America’s future.” 
Exiger spent $450,000 on federal lobbying in 2025, according to federal records. 
In declining to comment, GE Aerospace pointed NOTUS to a promotional blog post and press release about its participation, including a display of the GE9X, an engine that will power the future Boeing 777X widebody jet. 
Corporations that build goodwill with Trump at the Great American State Fair are “making entries into a favor bank that can be called on when needed,” said Jeff Hauser, executive director of the Revolving Door Project, a watchdog organization that tracks lobbying and political influence trends. 
And while critics have panned the Great American State Fair for its small crowds and limited fun quotient, “the people who are continuing to say the emperor’s clothes are stylish will be rewarded,” Hauser said. 
“Sticking with him while the State Fair is being derided  that’s demonstrating loyalty.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.4%Dave Levinthal: 3.3%NOTUS: 2.3%Confirmation Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 1.6%NOTUS: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Dave Levinthal: 2.9%NOTUS: 2.2%Availability Heuristic9.8%This article: 4.3%Dave Levinthal: 1.0%NOTUS: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 1.9%NOTUS: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.6%Dave Levinthal: 9.6%NOTUS: 6.6%Framing Effect14.6%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.9%NOTUS: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.9%NOTUS: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.5%NOTUS: 3.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Dave Levinthal: 0.3%NOTUS: 3.0%Pessimism Bias1.8%This article: 28.0%Dave Levinthal: 13.3%NOTUS: 10.5%Negativity Bias28.0%This article: 3.3%Dave Levinthal: 3.2%NOTUS: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.7%NOTUS: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Dave Levinthal: 0.3%NOTUS: 2.1%In-Group Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.3%NOTUS: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.3%NOTUS: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.2%Dave Levinthal: 1.1%NOTUS: 1.2%Recency Bias1.2%This article: 2.7%Dave Levinthal: 0.7%NOTUS: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Dave Levinthal: 0.5%NOTUS: 1.0%Ad Hominem3.1%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.6%Dave Levinthal: 6.5%NOTUS: 4.7%Appeal to Authority11.6%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.7%NOTUS: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 4.2%Dave Levinthal: 0.6%NOTUS: 0.5%Slippery Slope4.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.2%NOTUS: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.6%Dave Levinthal: 3.0%NOTUS: 4.9%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 1.2%Dave Levinthal: 0.6%NOTUS: 0.8%Red Herring1.2%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.9%NOTUS: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.5%Dave Levinthal: 3.0%NOTUS: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion4.5%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.6%Dave Levinthal: 2.9%NOTUS: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.6%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.3%Dave Levinthal: 0.7%NOTUS: 0.4%Burden of Proof4.3%This article: 3.1%Dave Levinthal: 0.5%NOTUS: 0.2%Appeal to Nature3.1%This article: 2.2%Dave Levinthal: 0.3%NOTUS: 0.2%Composition/Division2.2%This article: 2.6%Dave Levinthal: 0.9%NOTUS: 1.5%Anecdotal2.6%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.0%Dave Levinthal: 2.0%NOTUS: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.0%NOTUS: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 3.1%Dave Levinthal: 0.5%NOTUS: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy3.1%This article: 1.7%Dave Levinthal: 0.9%NOTUS: 2.2%Unattributed Quote1.7%This article: 3.8%Dave Levinthal: 2.4%NOTUS: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection3.8%This article: 14.0%Dave Levinthal: 5.6%NOTUS: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice14.0%This article: 4.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.8%NOTUS: 0.8%Indoctrination4.0%This article: 0.0%Dave Levinthal: 0.9%NOTUS: 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Dave Levinthal: 0.7%NOTUS: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.4%This article: 18.9%Dave Levinthal: 5.9%NOTUS: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…18.9%

1099 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers26%attributed speech811writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageVictoria Dixon • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageVictoria Dixon • 19 words • 0.0% coverageBill Turenne • 34 words • 100.0% coverageAxiom Space • 30 words • 0.0% coverageKody Gurfein • 34 words • 0.0% coverageKody Gurfein • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageJeff Hauser • 46 words • 0.0% coverageJeff Hauser • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJeff Hauser • 14 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bill Turenne

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words12% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+99.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%Bill Turenne: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -25.6 ptsWriter: 25.6%Bill Turenne: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.4 ptsWriter: 15.4%Bill Turenne: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -5.9 ptsWriter: 5.9%Bill Turenne: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.7 ptsWriter: 3.7%Bill Turenne: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Bill Turenne: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.