Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Spending results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 713 hits. Analysis detected 3,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (9,790 of 15,447 topics). This Corporate Spending is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Corporate Spending
Topic details
Total words: 4,396
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.2%16.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos