Speaker summary
35% 9 analyzed articles/videos 292.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Metropolitan Police Department results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 125 hits . Analysis detected 590.198 faulty-reasoning hits from 292.667 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,781 of 28,364 speakers). This Metropolitan Police Department is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. Metropolitan Police Department
Speaker details
Total words: 292.667
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.1% percentile 8.9% BS Score9 analyzed videos292.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 24.0% 24.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Composition/Division: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst