Side-job scam arrests ⁠4%

By The Japan Times⁠17%

6/11/2026, 12:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Anecdotal, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 205 faulty-reasoning hits from 208 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (20,385 of 21,182 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the article peer group.

The Japan Times 
June 11, 2026 
Side-job scam arrests 
By The Japan Times 
TOKYO — Police arrested three men and two women on suspicion of fraud in connection with a scam that targeted people looking for side jobs, the Metropolitan Police Department said Thursday. 
The suspects, who allegedly operated under the guise of a recruitment agency, are believed to have defrauded at least 10 people out of ¥1.5 million ($10,000) in total, according to the police. 
The arrests stem from a complaint filed by a 21-year-old woman who said she was hired by the agency to work as a data entry clerk, only to be told she needed to pay ¥30,000 for training materials and a company ID card. 
After paying the money, she was given a stack of papers and told to make copies, which she was then instructed to mail to various addresses. 
She never received any training or job placement, and the agency’s phone number was disconnected. 
Police said the suspects are believed to have used similar tactics to defraud others, targeting unemployed individuals and students looking for part-time work. 
Investigators are looking into whether the suspects have connections to similar scams that have been reported in other parts of the country. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.2%The Japan Times: 3.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.5%The Japan Times: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.6%The Japan Times: 4.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 11.1%The Japan Times: 0.5%The Japan Times: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic11.1%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.1%The Japan Times: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 7.8%The Japan Times: 14.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.7%The Japan Times: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 3.3%The Japan Times: 4.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.7%The Japan Times: 3.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 3.6%The Japan Times: 11.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.5%The Japan Times: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.6%The Japan Times: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.4%The Japan Times: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.0%The Japan Times: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.5%The Japan Times: 0.9%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 30.3%The Japan Times: 2.0%The Japan Times: 5.6%Appeal to Authority30.3%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%The Japan Times: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.1%The Japan Times: 1.7%The Japan Times: 4.5%Hasty Generalization11.1%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.2%The Japan Times: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.7%The Japan Times: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.5%The Japan Times: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.9%The Japan Times: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 19.7%The Japan Times: 0.8%The Japan Times: 1.0%Anecdotal19.7%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.4%The Japan Times: 3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 26.4%The Japan Times: 1.3%The Japan Times: 4.5%Unattributed Quote26.4%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.3%The Japan Times: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 2.6%The Japan Times: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.3%The Japan Times: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Japan Times: 1.2%The Japan Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

208 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers45%attributed speech115writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageThe Japan Times • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageThe Japan Times • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMetropolitan Police Department • 31 words • 0.0% coverageMetropolitan Police Department • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMetropolitan Police Department • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
86 attributed words92% of attributed speech36% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Unattributed Quote+64.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Metropolitan Police Department: 64.0%64.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.