Author summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glenn Puit results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 181 hits . Analysis detected 1,892 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,394 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,381 of 6,316 authors). This Glenn Puit is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Glenn Puit
Author details
Total words: 2,394
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst