Speaker summary
77% 12 analyzed articles/videos 673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megyn Kelly results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 277 hits . Analysis detected 1,706.451 faulty-reasoning hits from 673 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,638 of 28,364 speakers). This Megyn Kelly is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Megyn Kelly
Speaker details
Total words: 673
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.1% percentile 7.3% BS Score12 analyzed videos673 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 23.4% 23.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 29.8% 29.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 18.8% 18.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% Tu Quoque: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst