Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Onion results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 2,610 hits. Analysis detected 13,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,956 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,693 of 6,316 authors). This Rebecca Onion is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Rebecca Onion
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
26%Rebecca Onion (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,956
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

26% percentile
025507510025.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.4%17.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate