Author summary
66% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Hunter results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 2,354 hits . Analysis detected 19,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,304 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,223 of 6,425 authors). This Jack Hunter is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Jack Hunter
Author details
Total words: 18,304
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.9% 12.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst