Speaker summary
49% 21 analyzed articles/videos 940.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Masoud Pezeshkian results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 279 hits . Analysis detected 2,063.63 faulty-reasoning hits from 940.667 analyzed words across 21 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 4% (25,833 of 26,731 speakers). This Masoud Pezeshkian is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Masoud Pezeshkian
Speaker details
Total words: 940.667
Content count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 5.6% BS Score21 analyzed videos940.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 15.2% 15.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst