Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ted Snider results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,021 hits . Analysis detected 8,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,904 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,875 of 6,169 authors). This Ted Snider is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Ted Snider
Author details
Total words: 8,904
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.5% 11.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst