ZeroHedge72%

New Strikes On Iran Significantly Stronger Than Earlier Attacks, As IRGC Targets US Navy Warships 56%

By Tyler Durden63%

7/7/2026, 6:10:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 798 hits. Analysis detected 5,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,926 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.2% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,809 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the article peer group.

Summary: 
* US strikes on Iran announced, as 'heavy costs' for earlier targeting of multiple commercial vessels 
* Oil rises as Treasury revokes June 21 Iran oil waiver 
* Hormuz Threat Level Raised To "Severe" 
* Three maritime incidents reported on Hormuz in last 24 hours 
* Another unidentified vessel hit by a Drone 
* IRGC forces hit a Saudi Tanker 
* IRGC forces hit a Qatari LNG tanker 
* * * 
'Four to Five Times Larger' Than Earlier Strikes 
US officials are vowing bigger, more sustained and prolonged strikes against Iran tonight, according to the latest being reported in CNN and Axios: 
The U.S. has launched a significantly expanded wave of airstrikes on Iran that is four to five times larger than the strikes carried out 10 days ago, a U.S. official told Axios. 
The official said the operation is expected to continue for hours. 
Iran state media is meanwhile reporting on an initial retaliation by its forces (though not initially confirmed in other international sources): 
Iran fires several anti-ship missiles and drones towards US Navy warships in the Sea of Oman, Fars reports 
More from state media on what could be mounting civilian casualties: 
The state broadcaster reports that “most of the attacks” by the US in southern Iran have “targeted civilian areas”. 
This comes as the US claims its military hit Iranian missile and defence systems in its latest attacks. 
Iran's president is hastily traveling back to the Islamic Republic, cutting short funeral observances for Khamenei among Shia communities in Iraq: 
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has left the Iraqi city of Najaf to return to Tehran, according to the IRIB broadcaster, following the US’s latest strikes. 
Pezeshkian had been in Iraq to attend funeral rites for Khamenei, whose body had arrived in Najaf on Tuesday night. 
According to Press TV, Pezeshkian had also planned to hold high-level talks with Iraqi government officials. 
US Launches New Iran Strikes, In First Since Ayatollah's Funeral 
The US military has announced it has commenced fresh strikes against Iran in the wake of projectiles striking multiple international tankers in the Strait of Hormuz earlier on Tuesday. 
US Central Command (CENTCOM) in a public X post says its "forces have begun launching a series of powerful strikes against Iran to impose heavy costs for targeting and attacking commercial shipping crewed by innocent civilians in an international waterway." 
"The U.S. strikes are in response to Iranian attacks on three commercial vessels that were transiting the Strait of Hormuz. 
Iran’s demonstrated aggression was unwarranted, dangerous, and a clear violation of the ceasefire," it added. 
These will mark the first US strikes against the Islamic Republic since last Friday's start of week-long funeral ceremonies for the slain Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 
Trump had indicated a pause in both strikes and diplomacy was on in order for the burial to take place. 
The new US military escalation began around or just after midnight Tehran time. 
Just before the start of the fresh Pentagon action, Mohsen Rezaei, adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, said on Iranian state TV that American attempts to forge an alternative route in the Strait of Hormuz will lead to the failure of negotiations between the two states. 
"It is quite clear that the United States will lead the negotiations with Iran to failure," Rezaei said. 
He also demanded the "the withdrawal of the United States from the region" - which can ensure lasting peace, he asserted. 
And now there could be a return to full war in Lebanon as well. 
Per breaking newswires: 
* Israeli fighter jets carried out attacks in Barachit and Beit Yahoun in southern Lebanon 
* US Strikes Targeted Air Defense Systems, Drone Sites: Axios 
* Several explosions have been heard near Sirik and Qeshm in southern Iran, according to Iran’s Fars news agency: Al Jazeera 
As expected, Tehran has condemned the new attacks as a severe US violation of the MoU. 
Early reports suggest bombing raids on strategically situated small Iranian islands just off the Strait of Hormuz: 
According to state TV, six explosions have been heard on the island of Qeshm which is the largest island in the vicinity of the Strait of Hormuz, with very geostrategic significance when it comes to Iran’s control and authority over the Strait of Hormuz. 
The state TV also says that at least seven explosions have been heard in the areas close to Sirik Port which is very important because it oversees the Strait of Hormuz, another strategic point from which Iran imposes its control and authority over the Strait of Hormuz. 
Treasury Revokes Iran Oil Waiver 
In a surprise move on Tuesday, the Trump admin revoked a license allowing Iran to sell oil on the open market, eliminating the primary economic benefit for Tehran as part of the interim peace deal/MOU with the US and threatening to unravel the agreement after days of skirmishes in the Strait of Hormuz. 
The Treasury Department said the June 21 license granted to Iran after several months of war would no longer apply, an announcement that came hours after the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps fired missiles and drones at ships crossing the Strait of Hormuz. 
The Treasury allowed for a grace period until July 17 for transactions already authorized under the license. 
The price of oil rose sharply after the news, even as President Trump has boasted that his efforts to wind down the war with Iran have lowered the price of gas and other products. 
The price of a barrel of Brent Crude oil was almost $76.00 after the announcement, up about 5% on Monday’s closing price. 
As the WSJ notes, since signing the MOU with Iran last month, which reopened the strait and ended the U.S. blockade on Iran, the US said it would only provide Tehran with financial incentives for abiding by the agreement. 
Allowing Iran to sell oil and to repatriate dollar-denominated revenue into the Iranian banking system was the most important incentive in convincing Tehran to enter a 60-day diplomatic process aimed at ultimately dismantling its nuclear program. 
The waiver was supposed to be in place for two months and could then have been extended. 
However, a US official told the WSJ that Iran’s actions in the strait were considered unacceptable and deserved a stern response. 
The U.S. would continue to negotiate with Iran toward a final agreement, the official said and Bloomberg added that "US official says negotiators continue to work in good faith towards a final and Iran's actions in the Strait were wholly unacceptable to the US and will be met with consequences." 
An initial salvo perhaps, preparing for more direct action to come? 
According to the Journal, US officials were surprised by Iran’s attacks on commercial ships amid ongoing negotiations and the funeral of the former supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 
The Trump administration has sought to set up a backchannel between the U.S. military and the IRGC, a powerful military and political force in Iran, but the IRGC has been slow to engage. 
The US has continued to coordinate with commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz using a route that it cleared near the coast of Oman. 
Over the weekend, the IRGC warned ships that it was prepared to target them if they used the route promoted by the US and Oman. 
Early Tuesday, Iran fired antiship cruise missiles and one-way attack drones at vessels seeking to cross the southern route. 
Three ships were struck, including an LNG tanker, and the US downed some of drones. 
Meanwhile, American warships remain on standby to restart the blockade of Iranian ports should Trump choose to reimpose it. 
In summary, the two most critical elements of the interim deal are now under threat: the oil sanctions relief and safe passage for vessels through the Strait of Hormuz. 
In effect, the entire ceasefire is now in question. 
Other critical elements of the interim deal included the lifting of the US blockade on Iranian ports and commerce, as well as an agreement by Tehran to maintain “the status quo” on its nuclear program and for the U.S. to do likewise on sanctions against Iran. 
Tehran was also negotiating for the release of some of its frozen funds trapped by U.S. sanctions. 
Perhaps worst of all, people close to the talks say there has been no substantive progress made yet by the U.S. and Iranian teams on a final nuclear agreement, with technical talks on the issue barely commencing. 
Nate Swanson, former National Security Council director for Iran and currently at the Atlantic Council, said the Treasury Department’s action establishes a direct link between the reopening of the strait and the oil sanctions waiver. 
For the interim deal to be stabilized, Washington and Tehran would have to work through issues left open by the interim deal, he said. 
“Iran wants money and the U.S. wants the free flow of energy. 
The MoU is too volatile to survive without some follow-on deal as neither side is getting what they want with the current status quo,” he said. 
One wonders if the decision means Washington has reverted to in effect giving the US Navy carte blanche to seize Iranian tankers, also as the Gulf region awaits likely American retaliation for the earlier Tuesday Iranian attacks (see below) on several international vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. 
As a reminder, exactly a week ago we wrote the following: "Iran was euphoric when as part of the Trump MOU, it got permission to flood the world with its oil after Trump effectively eliminate sanctions that had been in place for multiple decades. 
However, it has quickly run into another, potentially far bigger problem: as the armada of Iranian oil tankers exits the Persian Gulf, it is now struggling to find buyers before the expiry of a 60-day window granted by Washington." 
**Hormuz Threat Level Raised To "Severe"** 
The Joint Maritime Information Center has upgraded the Hormuz chokepoint threat level to "Severe" after several tankers were targeted in the critical waterway. 
Eurasia Group analyst Gregory Brew warned that at least three vessels were attacked in the Hormuz over the last 24 hours, with the possibility that as many as five ships were struck in the strait. 
"Traffic is continuing but has gone dark, with ships switching off AIS." 
Brew noted, "Hard to see how US can let this stand--reckon some kind of kinetic response is coming." 
Bloomberg commodities expert Javier Blas noted that while Iran attacked at least three tankers in the Strait of Hormuz today, it was simultaneously loading its own tankers at Kharg Island, the country's key energy export hub. 
"This just shows me that the Omani Route isn't viable. 
Iran can still strike vessels. 
It's really as simple as that. 
It's not a solution," Brett Erickson of Obsidian Risk Advisors wrote on X. 
The latest Bloomberg ship-tracking data show vessel traffic through the Hormuz is declining today. 
This could suggest that shipowners are refusing to transit the waterway amid the latest flare-up in IRGC drone and missile attacks. 
Another possibility is that more ships are going dark by switching off transponders before crossing, meaning the decline in visible traffic may understate actual flows through the chokepoint. 
3rd Ship Attack Reignites Hormuz Crisis 
IRGC forces hit a Qatari LNG tanker, a Saudi crude tanker, and an unidentified vessel in the Hormuz shipping channel in the last 24 hours. 
Earlier, we reported that a fully loaded Qatari LNG tanker was struck by a projectile near the Omani coast while exiting the Strait of Hormuz. 
Bloomberg later reported that a Saudi oil tanker suffered damage after being hit by IRGC projectiles. 
Now, UKMTO is reporting a third incident: 
*UKMTO has received a report of a further incident involving a tanker transiting the Strait of Hormuz. 
The tanker was struck by an unknown Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and has sustained minor structural damage. 
No casualties or environmental impact reported, and vessel is continuing to its next port of call. 
* 
Three attacks on the Hormuz shipping channel today will create significant unease among shipping companies and seriously test the US-Iran interim peace deal, which halted attacks several weeks ago and ended the US naval blockade on the critical waterway, allowing the normalization process to begin. 
Qatari LNG Tanker Hit By Iranian Missile In Hormuz Chokepoint 
A fully loaded Qatari LNG tanker was struck by a projectile near the Omani coast while exiting the Strait of Hormuz, raising fresh concerns that disruptions across the key energy maritime chokepoint could persist longer than traders had expected. 
Brent crude rose more than 1% to $72.76 a barrel as traders reassessed the war-risk premium in the Gulf area. 
The Al Rekayyat, owned by Qatar's state shipping company Nakilat, was struck early Tuesday about 8 nautical miles east of Limah, Oman, according to Bloomberg, which cited people familiar with the matter and an alert from EOS Risk Group. 
EOS said the maritime incident involved either an Iranian suicide drone or a missile strike that resulted in a fire on the Al Rekayyat. 
No casualties were reported. 
Al Rekayyat was fully loaded at Qatar's Ras Laffan export terminal, making it the first Qatari LNG carrier targeted since the US-Iran conflict began in late February. 
The tanker appeared to be transiting part of the Hormuz chokepoint with its transponder off, indicating it was not on an Iranian-approved shipping route. 
Following the attack, another Qatari-loaded LNG carrier, Al Areesh, made an abrupt U-turn before entering the strait and began circling, Bloomberg ship tracking data showed. 
Other tankers continued to sail through the highly contested chokepoint, including oil tankers and LPG carriers, using both Iran-approved and US-managed routes. 
Later today, President Trump heads to a NATO summit in Ankara, where the Iran conflict is expected to be the center of discussion among world leaders. 
US-Iran talks remain suspended while Tehran holds funeral ceremonies for late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. 
Qatar has said negotiations will resume after the ceremonies. 
UBS analyst Justinus Steinhorst commented on market reaction: 
Energy {UBXEENER} is among the best sectors on Tuesday after an LNG tanker was hit at Hormuz, rekindling fears around longer term disruption. 
Progress to normalise flows through strait appears to be stalling slightly with crossings still well below pre-conflict levels. 
UBS analyst Aditi Samajpati noted: 
Oil prices may remain under pressure in the near term as additional barrels from previously stranded ships in the Strait of Hormuz reach the market. 
UBS Wealth Management CIO however believes the current price level overestimates how quickly traffic through the waterway will normalize as it takes time for shipping confidence to be fully restored and for tankers to return to the Persian Gulf to load oil for export. 
The Strait is now accommodating fewer ships than before the conflict began, and the recovery of shut-in production is likely to be slower than expected, CIO says, adding that broad commodity exposure continues to offer diversification benefits in a portfolio. 
Vessel flows on the Hormuz chokepoint (transponders on) remain elevated but well below pre-war levels. 
This may only suggest the normalization process will take longer than expected. 
Kpler analyst Muyu Xu said: 
The continued use of different shipping lanes suggests that traffic through the strait remains operational, but is fragmented as shipowners adopt different routing strategies based on their individual risk assessments. 
**Latest Iran and Hormuz headlines (courtesy of Bloomberg):** 
**Strait of Hormuz Attacks** 
 Iran reportedly fired at least two missiles at commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz on Monday night, with both vessels suffering significant damage but no casualties 
 A Qatari LNG carrier, Al Rekayyat, was struck by a projectile near the Omani coast on Tuesday morning as it exited the Strait of Hormuz 
 Another loaded LNG tanker, Al Areesh, appears to have U-turned in the Persian Gulf on Tuesday following the strikes 
 The attacks are testing a late-June US-Iran deal intended to halt attacks in the waterway as the two sides work toward a peace agreement 
**Diplomatic Developments** 
 Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned on Tuesday that negotiations on a final deal will not commence if threats continue, referencing a memorandum of understanding with the US 
 Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian will travel to Iraq on Tuesday to attend funeral processions for former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, scheduled for Wednesday in Najaf and Karbala 
**Market Impact** 
 European natural gas prices surged as much as 6% on Tuesday, the most in a month, following the attacks on ships in the Strait of Hormuz 
 Oil prices climbed on Tuesday, with Brent trading near $73 a barrel, as the attacks highlighted continued risks to vessels in the critical waterway 
 Gold fell for a second day on Tuesday, dropping as much as 1.2% to below $4,120 an ounce, as the Hormuz attacks rekindled inflation concerns 
 France lowered its 2026 GDP growth forecast to 0.7% from 0.9%, citing the Middle East conflict as a factor holding back output 
**Oil Trade Developments** 
 India's state-run refiners are in talks with traders marketing Iranian crude and preparing to buy barrels if the US extends waivers beyond August or eases restrictions 
 Two supertankers hauling Saudi crude are heading to the US for the first time since February, following the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz 
 Russia's Urals crude price averaged $41.66 a barrel at western ports in early July, falling to pre-Iran war levels and less than half the level during the height of oil market turmoil in April 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.2%Tyler Durden: 7.7%ZeroHedge: 7.8%Confirmation Bias5.2%This article: 1.4%Tyler Durden: 1.6%ZeroHedge: 1.6%Anchoring Bias1.4%This article: 6.6%Tyler Durden: 4.6%ZeroHedge: 4.6%Availability Heuristic6.6%This article: 4.9%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 0.7%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Hindsight Bias0.7%This article: 5.5%Tyler Durden: 2.8%ZeroHedge: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias5.5%This article: 4.2%Tyler Durden: 10.8%ZeroHedge: 10.8%Framing Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.0%ZeroHedge: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.7%Tyler Durden: 3.7%ZeroHedge: 3.8%Pessimism Bias12.7%This article: 27.3%Tyler Durden: 11.1%ZeroHedge: 11.1%Negativity Bias27.3%This article: 2.9%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias2.9%This article: 1.9%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error1.9%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.2%ZeroHedge: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.3%ZeroHedge: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.0%ZeroHedge: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.8%ZeroHedge: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.4%Tyler Durden: 3.2%ZeroHedge: 3.3%Recency Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.6%ZeroHedge: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 24.4%Tyler Durden: 6.2%ZeroHedge: 6.2%Appeal to Authority24.4%This article: 2.6%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.3%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 5.1%Tyler Durden: 2.4%ZeroHedge: 2.4%Slippery Slope5.1%This article: 0.8%Tyler Durden: 0.3%ZeroHedge: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.8%This article: 5.9%Tyler Durden: 6.7%ZeroHedge: 6.7%Hasty Generalization5.9%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.8%ZeroHedge: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.1%Tyler Durden: 5.1%ZeroHedge: 5.1%Appeal to Emotion1.1%This article: 3.5%Tyler Durden: 1.5%ZeroHedge: 1.5%Begging the Question3.5%This article: 27.1%Tyler Durden: 5.4%ZeroHedge: 5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)27.1%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.7%ZeroHedge: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.9%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.2%Anecdotal3.9%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.5%Tyler Durden: 2.7%ZeroHedge: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.5%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.2%ZeroHedge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.2%Tyler Durden: 4.1%ZeroHedge: 4.1%Unattributed Quote12.2%This article: 1.0%Tyler Durden: 1.9%ZeroHedge: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.0%This article: 15.0%Tyler Durden: 11.2%ZeroHedge: 11.2%Biased Writer Voice15.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.5%ZeroHedge: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.8%ZeroHedge: 2.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Tyler Durden: 0.9%ZeroHedge: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.0%

2926 words analyzed.

Speakers

16speakers25%attributed speech2,206writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageIRIB • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coveragePress TV • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageUS Central Command (CENTCOM) • 40 words • 100.0% coverageUS Central Command (CENTCOM) • 20 words • 100.0% coverageUS Central Command (CENTCOM) • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMohsen Rezaei • 47 words • 100.0% coverageMohsen Rezaei • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMohsen Rezaei • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAl Jazeera • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageNate Swanson • 35 words • 0.0% coverageNate Swanson • 24 words • 0.0% coverageNate Swanson • 12 words • 0.0% coverageNate Swanson • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageGregory Brew • 35 words • 0.0% coverageGregory Brew • 12 words • 0.0% coverageGregory Brew • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJavier Blas • 36 words • 0.0% coverageJavier Blas • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJavier Blas • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJavier Blas • 6 words • 0.0% coverageBrett Erickson • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageUKMTO • 17 words • 100.0% coverageUKMTO • 17 words • 0.0% coverageUKMTO • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageEOS • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJustinus Steinhorst • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAditi Samajpati • 25 words • 0.0% coverageUBS Wealth Management CIO • 44 words • 0.0% coverageUBS Wealth Management CIO • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMuyu Xu • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageAbbas Araghchi • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mohsen Rezaei

100%flagged-word coverage
86 attributed words12% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Unattributed Quote+46.9 ptsWriter: 7.8%Mohsen Rezaei: 54.7%54.7%Biased Writer Voice-19.9 ptsWriter: 19.9%Mohsen Rezaei: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Mohsen Rezaei: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -0.8 ptsWriter: 0.8%Mohsen Rezaei: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.