Speaker summary
70% 35 analyzed articles/videos 1,865 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Warner results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 385.713 hits . Analysis detected 4,485.659 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,865 analyzed words across 35 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,825 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Warner is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Mark Warner
Speaker details
Total words: 1,865
Article count: 35
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score35 analyzed videos1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst